The Trax displays less lean in the corners than one would expect from such a stubby SUV, but it can't match the sharp turn-in or overall dynamic feel of cars such as the Kia Soul and Mazda CX-30. The ride, in general, is firm, which gives the Trax a feeling of stability. The steering might not provide much feedback, but that is not what the Trax is all about. The Trax offers light and easily controllable steering in town, making it perfect for zipping in and out of tight spaces. Chevrolet had all of those elements in mind when it designed the Trax, and in the city, this clearly pays off. The cavernous HR-V, which held four more carry-ons with the seats folded, is the pick of the subcompact-crossover litter for those who frequently carry large items.The city-focused subcompact SUV is meant to be the suburban vehicle of choice due to its slightly lifted ride height, good visibility, and, most importantly, its ability to maneuver in and out of tight spaces like parking lots and drive-throughs. Still, we managed to fit 18 carry-on suitcases with the rear seats stowed. The Trax's cargo area is on the small side of its segment, and its rear seats aren't as easy to fold as they are in several competitors. Rivals including the Honda HR-V, the Jeep Renegade, and CX-3 offer all of the above features for less money. Only the top Premier model offers nicer amenities such as heated front seats and a sunroof, while automatic climate control isn't available at all. Venture further down the center stack, though, and you'll find cheap-feeling climate controls and cut-rate plastics around the shifter and center console. There are also some stitched dashboard inserts that help cultivate a more upscale look. The Trax comes standard with a well-integrated, easy-to-use touchscreen mounted at the top of the dashboard. Interior, Comfort, and CargoĪ high seating position and expansive headroom make the Trax's cabin feel airy and spacious, but it actually has less rear-seat room and cargo space than several of its competitors. The Soul not only achieved better fuel economy but also provided a whopping 63-hp advantage over the Trax and accelerated to 60 mph nearly three seconds quicker. The front-wheel-drive Trax underperformed in our highway fuel-economy test, falling short of its EPA number with a 29-mpg result. The Trax's drivetrain provides a subpar combination of fuel efficiency and acceleration that is worse than its rivals. There's not much variation among the Trax's competitive set in terms of fuel economy, both by the EPA's standards and in our real-world testing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |